Slorks Blog
If Slorks had started in the blog era — tech in writing, pictures and discussion
عEN中Sign inTime: --:-- Gulf time
Ad space · 970×90 · Advertise here

Home › News › #2026-10-12-galaxy-s27-chips-prices-leak

News سامسونجSamsungGalaxy S27Galaxy S27 UltraExynosتسريبات

Galaxy S27 Ultra بـ Snapdragon بكل الدول؟ تسريبات المعالجات والأسعار لسلسلة سامسونج الجاية

Galaxy S27 Ultra Snapdragon-only worldwide? The chip and price leaks for Samsung’s next lineup

by Slorks 2026-10-12 1 0 replies
Machine-translated — the Arabic text is the original
Galaxy S27 Ultra بـ Snapdragon بكل الدول؟ تسريبات المعالجات والأسعار لسلسلة سامسونج الجايةالصورة: GSMArena

The Galaxy S27 lineup is expected in Q1 2027 with four models: S27, S27+, the new S27 Pro and S27 Ultra, and this week brought a wave of leaks. None of it is confirmed by Samsung.

Chip
Exynos 2700 vs Snapdragon: the question that returns every year — Photo: GSMArena

The leaks

S27 UltraSnapdragon 8 Elite Gen 6 only, worldwide (Korean tipster Lanzuk). GSMArena says no final decision yet
S27 · S27+ · S27 ProExynos 2700 (second-gen 2nm) in most of Europe, Asia and Africa; Snapdragon in the US
International price (leak)S27 $999 · S27+ $1,199 · S27 Pro $1,399 · Ultra $1,499–1,549 ($100–150 less in the US); targets, subject to change
DisplaysM14+ on S27/S27+, M16 (possible privacy display) on Pro/Ultra; rumoured first-time DC dimming on Pro/Ultra

Why it matters

The leak doesn’t name the Middle East. If the Gulf follows the Europe/Asia group, the S27, S27+ and S27 Pro would be Exynos here, and a guaranteed Snapdragon means going Ultra. DC dimming is good news for flicker-sensitive eyes.

Ad space · full width · Advertise here

My take

A Snapdragon-only Ultra is a sensible call that ends the debate for the priciest model. The real test is the S27 Pro: if the Exynos 2700 is as strong as reported, it becomes the smartest buy in the lineup. If it stumbles, Samsung repeats the old Exynos story.

Sources: GSMArena · SamMobile · Android Headlines · 9to5Google · GSMArena (DC)

Reading time: 2 min
Worth reading?
Reply0
Reply0
Voting and rating need no account. Replying does — it keeps the discussion clean.Sign in to reply
No replies yet — be the first.